Legal Opinion

Gordon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 13, 1991No. 89-2986PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We affirm in all respects. One issue raised by the defendant is controlled by our decision in Barfield v. State, 564 So.2d 616 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). In Barfield we affirmed the defendant’s sentence on the grounds that temporal proximity of crimes is a valid reason for departure when the timing of the offense relates to prior offenses and the release from incarceration or other supervision. Likewise, in the instant case, we affirm the defendant’s departure sentence because the temporal proximity of the crime alone provides a valid reason for departure from the sentencing guidelines.

As in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Barfield v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gordon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API