Rinchey v. Stryker
New York Court of Appeals
This was an action brought against the sheriff of Kings . county for seizing the goods claimed by the plaintiff, on an attachment issued against the property of William Cartwright and Moses R. Hazzard. The sheriff defended under such writ of attachment, and claimed the property levied upon as the property of Cartwright and Hazzard, which had been disposed of by them with intent to hinder, delay, &c., then* creditors.
1Opinion of the Court
The court were of the opinion that the sheriff was entitled to defend, on the ground that the goods seized were the prop-" erty of Cartwright and Hazzard, who had disposed of the same with intent to defraud, &c., then* creditors, and that the plaintiff, in receiving the property, had notice of the fraudulent intent, &c.
The case is reported at length in 26 How. Pr., p. 75. The opinion was written by Balcom, J., in which all concurred, except Emott, J., who-did not vote.
2Cited by6 opinions
- Mechanics' & Traders' Bank of Jersey City v. DakinNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Lane v. InnesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Gross v. DalyNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1875
- Hart v. A. L. Clarke & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Grady v. BoweNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1882
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.