Legal Opinion

City of Centralia v. Norden

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 28, 1994No. WD 48396PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Property owners appeal from the judgment of the trial court declaring that annexation of 426 acres of land by the City of Centraba for residential purposes is reasonable and necessary. 1 The plaintiff in this case is the City of Centraba and the defendants are the owners of ah the property interests in the land subject to annexation.

Judgment is affirmed.

In 1987, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Centraba adopted a General Comprehensive Plan for the city, which was later adopted by the Board of Alderman (“Board”) of the city. In April, 1990, the Board adopted a resolution…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anglim v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  2. City of Bourbon v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  3. City of Ballwin v. HardcastleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. City of Eureka v. HallMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. City of Odessa v. CarrollMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lorenzini v. ShortMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. City of Rolla v. ArmalyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. City of Peculiar v. Effertz Bros Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. City of Parkville v. Northern FarmsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. City of Lake Winnebago v. GosewischMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API