Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of van Hogendorp

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided July 30, 1962Published

1Opinion of the Court

Joseph A. Cox, S.

The will of this testatrix created a trust for the benefit of her son and provided that, in addition to the trust income, 5% of the principal be paid to the son at the times he attained designated ages. It has been held ‘ ‘ that the principal payments to the income beneficiary be computed on the current worth of the trust principal at the time each payment becomes due ” (Matter of van Hogendorp, 110 N. Y. S. 2d 579, 580). The court now is asked to determine whether, for the purpose of computing the periodic invasions, trustees’ commissions, attorneys’ fees and other charges…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of RosenthalNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
  2. In re the Accounting of VeninoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957
  3. In re the Estate of JacobNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  4. In re the Construction of the Will of UtardNew York Surrogate's Court · 1955
  5. In re the Estate of BouverieNew York Surrogate's Court · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API