Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Burnett v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 18, 1987No. 73509Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBeasley, Judge

I concur in the judgment but cannot agree with all that is contained in the opinion.

I would not overrule Brown v. State, 161 Ga. App. 663 (289 SE2d 535) (1982).

Brown is distinguishable. There was nothing in the opinion to indicate that defendant was warned at any time of the dangers of proceeding without trial or knew of them. Thus there was no assurance that, when he was told he did not qualify for publicly-paid counsel, his decision whether to hire counsel or represent himself should be guided by the dangers of proceeding pro se.

Here it is abundantly clear from the record that defendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clarke v. ZantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  2. Cochran v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  3. Glaze v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  4. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  5. Horton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API