Commonwealth v. Brown
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
LIPEZ, Judge:
Appellant was found guilty, by a jury, of violating section 3731 of the Vehicle Code, 1 which provides, in relevant part, that “[a] person shall not drive any vehicle while . under the influence of alcohol . . . .” He alleges, on this appeal, that the trial court erred in instructing the jury on the elements of the offense. We agree, and therefore vacate the judgment of sentence and remand the cause for a new trial.
The Commonwealth’s evidence was in the form of testimony by witnesses who had observed appellant and his vehicle during the time in question. One witness testified…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Jacobson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Commonwealth v. KallusSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Prudhomme v. HultsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
- State v. PritchettSuperior Court of Delaware · 1961
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CrumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. JamesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. BobotasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. Costa-HernandezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. FarnerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.