Looper v. Colonial Coverlet Co.

DARR, District Judge.

The plaintiff has interposed a motion to require the defendant to answer certain interrogatories which were not answered but objected to. 1

For reasons set out in the opinion filed this day in the case of the Boysell Co. v. Colonial Coverlet Co., Inc., D.C., 29 F.Supp. 122, it is my judgment that the question is to be determined under the regulations of Rule 33, of the new Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.

The first objection is to that portion of interrogatory No. 1, under the head ing of (g), (i), (j), (k), (1), (m), (n), (o), (q), and…