M'Rae v. M'Lean
Supreme Court of Alabama
THE QUESTIONS IN THIS CAUSE. As to a creditor*slienin attachment; and the effect of a replevy bond thereon. As to a description, in pleading, of the name of an obligee in a bond. In error from Autauga Circuit Court.
Read the full summary
THE QUESTIONS IN THIS CAUSE. As to a creditor*slienin attachment; and the effect of a replevy bond thereon. As to a description, in pleading, of the name of an obligee in a bond. In error from Autauga Circuit Court. This was an action of debt upon a bond, which had been executed bj the plaintiffs in error, to the defendant, as a replevy bond in attachment. ' Certain slaves, the property of one Thomas J. Augustin, had been attached by one Watson, and replevied by Augustin, who gave the usual bond to McLean, the Sheriff, with the plaintiffs as sureties, conditioned for a return of the slaves,…
1Opinion of the CourtHithcock, J.
This was an action of debt, brought by the defendant in error, in the Circuit Court of Autauga county, against the plaintiffs in error, upon a replevy bond in an original attachment, by the plaintiffs in error, as securities of Thomas J. Augus-tin, whose good were attached at the instance of one Isaac C. Watson, for whose use this suit was brought. The bond appeals to haye been given in pursuance of the act of 1818, relating to attachments against absconding debtors, the attachment having issued prior to the act of 1833, consolidating the attachment laws into one act, as the bond appears to…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Campbell v. SpenceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1843
- Hunt v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Cordaman v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
- Cox v. EasleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1847
- Fleming v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.