Legal Opinion

Jane Doe v. John Kelly

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 22, 2017No. 17-15381 17-15383PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge:

The influx of detainees in the Tucson Sector of the U.S. Border Patrol in 2015 resulted in Defendants (federal government officials and agents) holding detainees being processed for longer periods of time in overcrowded and unsanitary cells at eight different stations. Plaintiffs brought this action alleging inhumane and punitive treatment, and seeking injunctive relief. The district court granted a preliminary injunction requiring that Defendants provide detainees with mats and blankets after 12 hours. Defendants appeal, alleging that the district court…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Kingsley v. HendricksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2015

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Faour Fraihat v. US Imm. & Customs EnforcementCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  2. Kelvin Hernandez Roman v. Chad WolfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  3. Lecia Shorter v. Leroy BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  4. Hiq Labs, Inc. v. Linkedin CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  5. Hiq Labs, Inc. v. Linkedin CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API