Legal Opinion

General Valuations Co. v. City of Niagara Falls

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 3, 1938PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

We find that there is evidence sufficient to sustain a finding that the plaintiff has performed extra services as alleged in the second and third causes of action which were not included in the written contract.

The judgment of the Appellate Division dismissing the first cause of action should be affirmed, without costs. The order of the Appellate Division granting a new trial as to the second and third causes of action should be reversed, and the judgment of the Trial Term as to the second and third causes of action affirmed, without costs.

Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran,…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Slotkin v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  2. Slotkin Ex Rel. Slotkin v. Citizens Casualty Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
  3. A. G. Concrete Breakers, Inc. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
  4. Queens Park Gardens, Inc. v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  5. Slotkin v. Citizens Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API