Legal Opinion

Parsons v. Detroit & Canada Tunnel Co.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided July 31, 1936No. 5356PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOINET, District Judge.

On petitions filed herein the receiver of the defendant company asserts the illegality of ad valorem real property tax assessments against the defendant’s property for the years 1932, 1933, and 1934 because, principally, of erroneous methods of valuation, gross excessiveness, and unlawful discrimination, in violation of the due process and equality clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal Constitution. The court is asked to determine the amount justly due on account of said taxes and to restrain the collection of such portion of the taxes levied for said years…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Taylor v. SecorSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. St. Joseph Stock Yards Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of WakefieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. In Re TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Consumers Power Co. v. Big Prairie TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Geiger v. City of Southfield (In Re Continental Credit Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
  3. In Re 168 Adams Bldg. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
  4. In re Hotel Martin Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1941
  5. Steinbrecher v. TomanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API