Legal Opinion

Dill v. Board of Education

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 15, 1890PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Héard on bill, answer and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

Pitney, V. C.

The complainants (mother and daughter, the latter an infant) are the owners of a house and lot situate on the south side of *423Chestnut-street, in the city of Camden, about forty-five feet east of Newton avenue, and ask the court to enjoin the defendants from erecting a school-house on land immediately adjoining their lot on the west.

The defendants are the Board of Education of the City of Camden, and, as such, have jurisdiction over, and charge of, all the public school buildings and grounds in said city, and have contracted to build, and before the interposition of the court…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Story v. . New York Elevated R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Lahr v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. Smyles v. . HastingsNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  4. Child v. . ChappellNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  5. Barnes v. LloydMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Gerstley v. Globe Wernicke Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Loveladies Property Owners Ass'n, Inc. v. BARNEGAT CITY, ETC., CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  3. Christmas v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
  4. Mueller v. BohannonNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Gilpin v. Jacob Ellis Realties, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API