Schaff v. Sanders

On Motion for Rehearing.

Appellant’s cqunsel have filed a very able and exhaustive motion for a rehearing, attacking our opinion upon the same grounds asserted originally. We do not recede from our former position, but, in view of appellant’s severe attack upon our use of rule 62a as applied to his th'ird proposition, we undertake to state an additional main reason why the introduction of the testimony complained of does' not constitute error. The record discloses that another wit*678ness had, without objection, testified to the same matter, and the introduction of the testimony under such…