Legal Opinion

State v. Lyman

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 29, 1991No. 90-61034; CA A66828PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants. ORS 813.010. At trial, the state called his wife, Judy, but she asserted the marital privilege, OEC 505(3), and refused to testify. Defendant assigns error to the admission of her out of court statements under the exception for statements against pecuniary interest. OEC 804(3) (c). We reverse.

Officer Rothermund testified: He went to defendant’s home to investigate a domestic disturbance at 4:05 p.m. Defendant appeared coming out of the bushes and acknowledged that he had been drinking. Ten or fifteen minutes…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. CarlsonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Persad v. Kaiser Foundation Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sheffield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API