Legal Opinion

Veve v. Sanchez

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 2, 1912No. 42PublishedCited by 17 opinions

ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR PORTO RICO. The facts, which involve the rights of a mortgagee under a mortgage of land in Porto Rico, are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lamar

In 1885 Jose Avalo Sanchez mortgaged to Dona Maria Diaz y Siaea a sugar plantation in Porto Rico known as Bello Sitio, described as containing 400 cuerdas, and bounded on the north, south, east and west by the colin-dantes, or adjoining land owners, whose names were given. Suit to foreclose was instituted in 1889 and at the end of three years the mortgagee obtained a decree which, how ever, instead of ending the controversy, was the beginning of litigation in the Spanish courts which is said , to have been the most protracted and bitter in the history of the Island of Porto Rico.

The record of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Van Renesselaer v. KearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  2. Moore v. CrawfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Doolan v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Lodge's Lessee v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  5. Reed v. Proprietors of Locks and Canals on Merrimac RiverSupreme Court of the United States · 1850

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State of Texas v. BalliTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Gaztambide v. Sucesión de Ortiz PericchiSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1949
  3. Gutierrez Del Arroyo v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. City of New Orleans v. Joseph Rathborne Land Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
  5. Strong v. Delhi-Taylor Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API