Kirshner v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORFINGER, Judge.
The trial court erred in summarily denying the indigent appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief with respect to his claim that costs were imposed upon him without adequate notice and opportunity to be heard. The record supports appellant’s contention. Costs may not be assessed without notice or an opportunity to object. Harriet v. State, 520 So.2d 271 (Fla.1988); Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988); Morgan v. State, 527 So.2d 968 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Singletary v. State, 530 So.2d 460 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). We reverse the order appealed from insofar as it summarily…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mays v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
- Harriel v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
- Morgan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Singletary v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
3Cited by2 opinions
- Duffey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Larsen v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989