Legal Opinion

Wilkins v. Timmerman-Cooper

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 14, 2008No. 07-3339PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge.

This appeal arises out of the district court’s dismissal of petitioner-appellant Randolph Wilkins’s (“Wilkins”) petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The district judge held that the use of videoconferencing at Wilkins’s parole revocation hearing did not violate his rights to due process and to confront his accuser and therefore did not violate the Fifth and Sixth Amendments.

For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the district court’s decision.

I

We rely upon the factual findings of the state appellate court on direct…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Herbert v. BillyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  5. Michael E. Wolfe v. Anthony J. Brigano, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Peterson v. WarrenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  2. Leatherman v. PalmerDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2008
  3. United States v. John NeslerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  4. Adams v. BuntingDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2019
  5. Cook v. TurnerDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API