Legal Opinion

Griffin v. Baucom

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 16, 1985No. 8420SC736 and 8420SC962PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

Plaintiffs assign as error on appeal the entry of summary judgment against them and the denial of their motion to amend their complaint to conform to the evidence. We agree that summary judgment for defendants was improvidently granted, but uphold the order denying plaintiffs’ motion to amend their complaint.

We first address plaintiffs’ contention that summary judgment was improperly allowed. Summary judgment should be rendered upon motion “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Vassey v. BurchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Curl by and Through Curl v. KeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Bohannon v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. Johnson v. StevensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Estate of Loftin v. LoftinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Fell v. RamboCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  2. Roll v. EdwardsOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. In Re the Purported Last Will & Testament of SechrestCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Firestone v. GalbreathDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1995
  5. In Re the Will of CampbellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API