Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Baines

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 23, 1978No. Docket 77-1058Published

1Dissent

D. E. Holbrook, Jr., J.

(dissenting). Absent a rule preventing the use of a probationer’s revocation hearing testimony at the subsequent trial, I believe it is fundamentally unfair to hold the revocation hearing prior to the trial on the substantive offense when the sole basis for revoking probation is a finding that the probationer committed the substantive offense. Whether or not constitutionally mandated, such a rule is necessary to prevent a chill on a probationer’s exercise of his right to due process of law and his privilege against self-incrimination.

In general, a plea of guilty waives…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Commonwealth v. KatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. People v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. People v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1976

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API