People v. Baines
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Dissent
D. E. Holbrook, Jr., J.
(dissenting). Absent a rule preventing the use of a probationer’s revocation hearing testimony at the subsequent trial, I believe it is fundamentally unfair to hold the revocation hearing prior to the trial on the substantive offense when the sole basis for revoking probation is a finding that the probationer committed the substantive offense. Whether or not constitutionally mandated, such a rule is necessary to prevent a chill on a probationer’s exercise of his right to due process of law and his privilege against self-incrimination.
In general, a plea of guilty waives…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Commonwealth v. KatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- People v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.