Legal Opinion

Vornado, Inc. v. Breuer Electric Mfg. Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 25, 1968No. Patent Appeal 7878PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALMOND, Judge.

Vornado, Inc. appeals from the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board sustaining the opposition of Breuer Electric Mfg. Co. to appellant’s application for registration of “VOR-NADO” as a trademark for a wide variety of electrical appliances. These appliances, among others, include electric devices such as toasters, frying pans, cooking ranges and ovens, light bulbs, vacuum cleaners, floor polishing machines, hair dryers, room heaters, fans, portable room coolers and vaporizers.

Appellee in its notice of opposition alleges that appellant’s VORNADO so resembles TORNADO,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. J. C. Hall Company v. Hallmark Cards, IncorporatedCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  2. General Shoe Corporation v. Lerner Bros. Mfg. Co., Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
  3. The Russell Chemical Company v. Wyandotte Chemicals CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
  4. United States Steel Corporation v. Bijur Lubricating CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Tom Cunningham v. Laser Golf Corporation (Now Known as Belair Golf)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  2. Octocom Systems, Inc. v. Houston Computer Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  3. Kenner Parker Toys Inc. v. Rose Art Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  4. Specialty Brands, Inc. v. Coffee Bean Distributors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  5. Otto Roth & Co. v. Universal Foods Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API