Legal Opinion

Sheridan v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 20, 2015No. 14-696CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Motion to Dismiss; Patent Infringement; 22 U.S.C. § 2356; 28 U.S.C. § 1498(a); For the Benefit of the Government; Authorization or Consent.

OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL

WILLIAMS, Judge.

This ease comes before the Court on Defendant’s motion to dismiss the Complaint. Plaintiff pro se Timothy Sheridan claims that the Government is required to compensate him for the infringement of his patent by numerous private parties. However, Plaintiff has not alleged facts suggesting that the United States itself used or manufactured his claimed invention or authorized or consented to such use or manufacture…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  5. Department of the Army v. Blue Fox, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Arbutus Biopharma Corporation v. Moderna, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2022
  2. Golden v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  3. Jg Technologies, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API