Hayden v. . Florence Sewing Machine Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from the judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, affirming, as modified, a judgment entered in favor of plaintiff upon a verdict. This action was brought to recover damages for being dispossessed of certain premises in the city of New York.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, affirming, as modified, a judgment entered in favor of plaintiff upon a verdict. This action was brought to recover damages for being dispossessed of certain premises in the city of New York. In 1858, the Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Company became the lessees of the first floor and basement of the premises known as No. 505 Broadway, in the city of New York, for several years, ending May 1, 1867. The Manufacturing Company assigned their lease to Scott & Baldwin, May 1, 1864. Scott & Baldwin…
1Opinion of the Court
Earl, C.
The points taken before us that the verdict was against the evidence, and that the damages are excessive, cannot be considered here.
Upon the trial the defendant offered to show upon what ground the Supreme Court reversed the adjudication of the justice in the summary proceedings, and the offer was overruled, and an exception was taken by the defendant. In this there was no error. It was wholly immaterial upon what ground the adjudication was reversed. The reversal simply placed the parties, as to the premises in question, where they were before the proceedings were instituted. The…
2Cited by29 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. HerbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Arkansas Valley Land & Cattle Co. v. MannSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Eten v. . LuysterNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Corcoran v. HarranWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
- Craig v. CookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.