Legal Opinion

Stockton v. Kenney

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1898PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion to strike out defendant’s answer as frivolous.

1Opinion of the CourtClearwater, J.

The action is upon a note alleged to have been made by the defendant, a lawyer, to the order of the plaintiff. The answer denies any knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief, as to the truth of any. of the allegations contained in the ■complaint. The pleadings are verified. ' The plaintiff moves to ■ strike out the answer as frivolous, and for judgment on the pleadings, claiming that as the defendant is charged with making the note, he' knows whether he made it or not, and a denial of any knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegation that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shearman v. New York Central MillsNew York Supreme Court · 1855

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hill v. WarnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  2. Lehigh Valley Coal Co. v. YensavageCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API