Legal Opinion

School District No. 46 v. City of Bellevue

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1987No. 85-639PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKrivosha, C. J.

The question presented by this appeal is whether the provisions of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 79-801(4) (Cum. Supp. 1984) are unconstitutional for any of the various reasons alleged by the appellants, school district No. 46 of Sarpy County and David K. Kentsmith. The district court for Sarpy County, Nebraska, found, in effect, that § 79-801(4) did not violate either the U.S. Constitution or the Constitution of the State of Nebraska by sustaining demurrers filed by the appellees, the Bellevue School District and the City of Bellevue. For reasons more particularly set out hereinafter, the judgment of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Vance v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Searle v. YensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Nickel v. School Board of AxtellNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  5. State v. MichalskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Distinctive Printing & Packaging Co. v. CoxNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Willis v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Hayes v. Lame Deer High School DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Petition to Transfer TerritoryMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. In Re Plummer Freeholder PetitionNebraska Supreme Court · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API