Bumpass v. Stone
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Per curiam
Plaintiff, Sarah P. Bumpass,. commenced this action against Roy J. Stone et al. to recover an interest in real property represented by a mineral deed conveyed to defendant Roy J. Stone under date oí May 22, 1939. The interests of the remaining defendants are derived from the title acquired by Roy J. Stone, and a determination of the nature of the conveyance made to the defendant Stone is determinative of all of the questions at issue.
The trial court found generally for all of the defendants, sustaining the conveyance made to Roy J. Stone by the plaintiff. Plaintiff seeks to review the order…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Scott v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Miller v. FolsomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Tiger v. LozierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Graff v. HollidaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Powell v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Roberts v. StithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Robertson v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Van Hoozer v. BestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Van Hoozer v. BestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951