Legal Opinion

In re Schott

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 31, 1913PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by the Gem. City and Long Island Realty Company from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Kings County Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings, and bearing date the 23d day of May, 1913.

1Opinion of the Court

Burr, J.:

Prior to December 1, 1911, the Gem City and Long Island Realty Company was the owner of a parcel of ground irregular in shape, situated on the southerly side of East New York *825avenue in the borough of Brooklyn. Edward A. Schott and Marie Louise Schott held a mortgage upon said premises, given to secure the payment of $7,750. An action was then pending for the foreclosure of said mortgage, and on December 8, 1911, a judgment was entered therein in the usual form and directing a sale of the mortgaged premises. At that time proceedings were also pending for the opening of East…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Utter v. . RichmondNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Matter of City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Continental Insurance v. ReeveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  4. Harris v. Kingston Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  5. Hamilton v. FleckensteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Lafayette National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API