Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Tellez

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 5, 1990No. 1 CA-CR 88-1400Published

1Concurrence

FIDEL, P.J., and EUBANK, J.,

concur.

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION

In an earlier appeal to this court, appellant George Luis Tellez (defendant) challenged the imposition of a $37,500 fine in his plea agreement. The state contended the fine was mandatory. In our opinion filed December 7,1989,165 Ariz. at 381, 799 P.2d at 1, we held that the fine was not mandatory and vacated the plea agreement. Defendant subsequently filed a motion to reconsider arguing that the plea should be left intact with the fine stricken. The state agrees that the plea should remain intact but that the case should be remanded for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. CrowderArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Dominguez v. MeehanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  3. Dominguez v. MeehanArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. Marquez-SosaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  5. State v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API