Amsden v. Norwich Union Fire Ins. Soc.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana
At, Law.
1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.
In each of these cases there is a motion to remand to the state court, and the grounds of the motion are the same in both cases. The record shows that tiie action in each case was commenced on the 22d day of Way, 1890, in term-time of the Shelby circuit court, by the filing of a .complaint upon which there was an indorsement fixing June 7, 1890, as the return-day of the writ of summons; that the summons was accordingly issued and served upon the proper local agent of the respective companies more than 10 days before the return-day; that on Thursday, Juno 6lh, tiie court adjourned until…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Railway Co. v. Whitton's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Ohio & Mississippi Railroad v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
- Nashua and Lowell Railroad v. Boston and Lowell RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Merrick v. . Van SantvoordNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
- Gilbert v. HallIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Republic Motor Truck Co. v. Buda Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Pennsylvania Co. v. LeemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Gorgone v. Maryland Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
- Martin v. Old-First Nat. Bank & Trust Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1934