Legal Opinion

Smith v. New Plaza Pontiac Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 25, 1984No. WD35054PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERREY, Judge.

Appellant, defendant in the original action, appeals from an order overruling his motion for judgment N.O.Y., or in the alternative for a new trial. Judgment is affirmed.

On March 4, 1980, respondent, plaintiff above, purchased a 1979 Buick Riviera from appellant New Plaza Pontiac Company. Michael Riggins, a salesman for New Plaza Pontiac, negotiated and closed the sale with Kay Smith.

Riggins told Smith the car was a trade-in, that it was in good shape and had never been wrecked. Riggins disputes Smith and alleges he said the car was a repossessed vehicle from GMAC (General…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hudson v. CarrSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  2. Tietjens v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  3. Wood v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  4. Shechter v. BrewerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
  5. Baker v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Andes v. AlbanoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Estate of Overbey v. Chad Franklin National Auto Sales North, LLCSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  3. Misischia v. St. John's Mercy Medical CenterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Steele v. EllisDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1997
  5. Fireworks Restoration Co. v. HostoMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API