Legal Opinion

Mutual Supply Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 7, 1944No. C. D. 842PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CliNE, Judge:

This is a suit against the United States in which the plaintiff seeks to recover a part of the duty assessed on merchandise imported from Japan invoiced as “40 tubs, preserved vegetables. ‘Kakkyozuke’.” In liquidation the collector assessed duty on the merchandise at the rate of 35 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 775 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The plaintiff claims that duty should be assessed at 25 per centum by virtue of the terms of the trade agreement. with the Netherlands, published in T. D. 48075. The provisions involved read as follows:

Par. 775 Vegetables (including…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. La MannaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. United States v. Pacific Trading Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. Anderson v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Protest 36831-K of S. Hata Shoten, Ltd.United States Customs Court · 1945
  2. Protest 46119-K of Fujimoto Trading Co.United States Customs Court · 1946
  3. Protest 976556-G of Mutual Supply Co.United States Customs Court · 1945
  4. Protests 101825-K of Fujimoto Co.United States Customs Court · 1947
  5. Protests 25520-K of Alexander & Baldwin, Ltd.United States Customs Court · 1945

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API