Legal Opinion
Arbitration Between Minnesota State Patrol Troopers Ass'n Ex Rel. Pince v. State, Department of Public Safety
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 28, 1989No. C1-88-2292PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
The Minnesota State Patrol Troopers Association (Association) represented the grievant, Rodney Pince, in the appeal of his discharge from the Minnesota State Patrol (Patrol). After a hearing, the arbitrator held that the discharge was for just cause and supported by all the evidence. The Association filed an application to vacate the arbitration award in district court, which was denied. The Association now appeals the order confirming the arbitration award and denying its application to vacate. We affirm the arbitration award.
FACTS
Rodney Pince was a state trooper for 17…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sims v. Collection Division of the Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. HoeckSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- State v. AlbrechtCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- County of Hennepin v. Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc., Local 19Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Ascher v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.