Legal Opinion

Hair Studio 441, Inc. v. Boccone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 27, 2013PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for injunctive relief and to recover damages for breach of a covenant not to compete, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Woodard, J.), entered April 11, 2012, as denied their cross motion for summary judgment on the complaint and, in effect, granted the motion of the defendant Sidney Lamm, also known as Sid Lamm, incorrectly treated by the Supreme Court as a motion pursuant to CPLR 3211, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him, and the defendant Mario Boccone…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Indotronix International Corp. v. Naresh AyyalaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Kimble v. Dell Broadcasting Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. MANUFACTURERS AND TRADERS TRUST COM v. NIAGARA FALLS MALL, INC.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  2. Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co. v. Niagara Falls Mall, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co. v. Niagara Falls Mall, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API