Legal Opinion

Baker v. Oregon Railroad & Navigation

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from District Court, Shoshone County.

1Per curiam

— The respondent moves to dismiss the appeal from the judgment and the appeal from the order denying the motion for a new trial, on the ground that no appeal bond was given on either appeal as required by law. The record shows that only one undertaking upon appeal was given, and this undertaking recites both appeals, and then undertakes that the appellant will pay “all damages and costs which may be awarded against the appellant on the appeal”; and this undertaking is void for uncertainty, as heretofore held by this court in numerous decisions. Appellant, recognizing the sufficiency of the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Magee v. WhitacreNevada Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Mikulich v. CarnerNevada Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Thum v. BaileyIdaho Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API