Davis v. Rochester Can Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtSawyer, J.
A dispute between the parties having arisen over a claim for car demurrage, plaintiff, by its attorney, on February 14, 1919, wrote defendant: “ * * * if you think the position I have taken is unfair and not in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Interstate Commerce Commission governing these matters, I shall be very glad to have you submit the entire file to the Interstate Commerce Commission for a ruling, and I shall be very glad to abide by the same.” To this on February nineteenth following defendant replied: “ We have decided to *488accept your suggestion and submit the matter…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Boyd's Lessee v. GravesSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- People ex rel. Attorney General v. Utica InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1818
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Fudickar v. . Guardian Mutual Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Syracuse Savings Bank v. Yorkshire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Pennsylvania R. v. Fox & London, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
- Porto Transport, Inc. v. Consolidated Diesel Electric Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- In re the Arbitration between Robinson & RobinsonNew York Supreme Court · 1945
- McClare v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.