Dollar Rent A Car, Inc. v. Chang
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtGross, J.
The primary issue we address in this case is whether an offer of settlement was a “joint proposal” within the meaning of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442(c)(3), so that it was required to “state the amount and terms attributable to each party.” We hold that the proposal was not a joint proposal on behalf of two plaintiffs, but a proposal on behalf of one plaintiff. Therefore, the apportionment requirement of the rule was inapplicable.
On May 22, 2002, a proposal for settlement was served on the defendant in this case, appellant Dollar Rent a Car, Inc., pursuant to section 768.79, Florida…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Willis Shaw Express, Inc. v. Hilyer Sod, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2003
- Enterprise Leasing Co. South Central, Inc. v. HughesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Sontay v. Avis Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- BUDGET REN-A-CAR SYSTEMS, INC. v. BennettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- McElroy v. WhittingtonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pratt v. WeissDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012