Legal Opinion

United States v. Maria J. De Castro, A.K.A. Fifi

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided February 5, 1997No. 95-4648PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REAVLEY, Senior Circuit Judge:

Appellant Maria. De Castro complains that the district court erred in failing to let the jury decide the element of materiality in her trial for making false statements in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1010. We conclude that materiality is an element of this crime, but that fading to submit this element to the jury was harmless error. We also conclude that the admission of evidence regarding a government investigation was not plain error. Accordingly we affirm.

BACKGROUND

De Castro was charged with conspiracy to make and making false statements to the Department of…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. McArthurCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  2. United States v. De CastroCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. De CastroCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API