Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Ramirez v. McCravy

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 20, 2010No. SC09-490Published

1ConcurrencePariente, J.

Because the dissent contends that our discharge of jurisdiction should be of great concern to litigants, I write briefly to place the holding of the Third District opinion in the context of the facts of the case. If litigants must “beware” of any principle of law, it is that this Court’s administrative tolling orders cannot be employed to grant a windfall extension to a statute of limitations when the litigant has not alleged that he was unable to timely file the lawsuit because of the courthouse closure. Essentially, that is the holding of the Third District in Ramirez v. McCravy, 4 So.3d…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ramirez v. McCravyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API