Legal Opinion

Berg v. New York Society for the Relief of the Ruptured & Crippled

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 11, 1956PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDesmond, J.

The blood test was a “ medical act ” in the sense that it was preparatory to a transfusion. However, the test was performed not by a physician or nurse but by a technician who was employed and paid by the hospital and who was so far short of ‘1 professional ’ ’ status or attainments that only four to six weeks’ training was necessary for her job. She was no independent practitioner of a learned profession, working in but not for the hospital. She was a salaried employee doing routine work which required a minimum of skill and training. Therefore, without reviewing or revising the whole…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schloendorff v. Society of the New York HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1914

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Brown v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
  2. Frost v. Des Moines Still College of Osteopathy & SurgerySupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  3. Beeck v. Tucson General HospitalCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  4. Bernardi v. Community Hospital AssociationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  5. Musso v. Westfield Memorial HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API