Legal Opinion

King v. King

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 29, 1985No. 5-83-0740PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE JONES

delivered the opinion of the court:

This appeal presents the question whether the trial court had jurisdiction to hear the respondent’s post-trial motion seeking to supplement a judgment for dissolution of marriage and order adjudicating property rights when the motion was filed over two years after the entry of judgment and alleged that the order was not final because of failure to dispose of part of the parties’ marital property. We hold that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to hear the motion.

The petitioner, Lloyd Edward King, Jr., and the respondent, Terre Gail…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. People v. BerlandIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Flores v. DuganIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. BarthIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Corder v. CorderMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Metropolitan Trust Co. v. YoungIllinois Supreme Court · 1953

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of StefiniwAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  2. First Bank of Oak Park v. RezekAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  3. In re Marriage of HabermehlAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  4. In re Marriage of ThomasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. In re Marriage of HubbardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API