Legal Opinion

Brown v. Crosby

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided March 19, 2003No. 0:95-cv-07207PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

GRAHAM, District Judge.

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Petitioner’s Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (D.E.70).

THE COURT has considered the Petition, the pertinent portions of the record, and is otherwise duly advised in the premises.

BACKGROUND

This case involves the rare and extraordinary occasion where a petitioner in state custody has prevailed on a claim of “actual innocence,” as that legal term is defined in the Supreme Court’s decision in Schlup v. Delo, 513 U.S. 298, 316-321, 115 S.Ct. 851, 130 L.Ed.2d 808 (1995). On September 9, 2002, after conducting lengthy…

2Cases cited73 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re HolladayCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  2. Roberts v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  3. West v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  4. Marvin Cannon v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2015
  5. People v. JenkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API