Legal Opinion

Hardy v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 1876PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

(735) The complaint alleges: That the plaintiff is the administrator of the estate of Arnold Hardy, deceased.

The defendant is a corporation under the laws of North Carolina, chartered for the purpose of building and carrying on a railroad, and on the day of the wrongful act, neglect and default complained of, was operating a railroad between Wilmington and Charlotte, North Carolina, and was a common carrier.

On the 17th day of June, 1874, Arnold Hardy, the intestate of the plaintiff, being then on a train of cars of the defendant on his way to Wilmington, N.C. by the wrongful act, neglect and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Conley v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  2. Johnson v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  3. Crutchfield v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  4. Sellars v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Crutchfield v. . R. D. R. R. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  2. Johnson v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  3. Crutchfield v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API