Hardy v. . R. R.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
(735) The complaint alleges: That the plaintiff is the administrator of the estate of Arnold Hardy, deceased.
The defendant is a corporation under the laws of North Carolina, chartered for the purpose of building and carrying on a railroad, and on the day of the wrongful act, neglect and default complained of, was operating a railroad between Wilmington and Charlotte, North Carolina, and was a common carrier.
On the 17th day of June, 1874, Arnold Hardy, the intestate of the plaintiff, being then on a train of cars of the defendant on his way to Wilmington, N.C. by the wrongful act, neglect and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Conley v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- Johnson v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
- Crutchfield v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
- Sellars v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
3Cited by3 opinions
- Crutchfield v. . R. D. R. R. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
- Johnson v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
- Crutchfield v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877