Legal Opinion
G.E.S. v. Florissant, City of
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided January 13, 2025No. 4:24-cv-01412Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION G.E.S., et al. ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) Case No.: 4:24-cv-01412-JSD ) CITY OF FLORISSANT, ) (Consolidated with 4:24-cv-01445, 4:24-cv- ) 01528, and 4:24-cv-01571) And ) ) OFFICER JULIAN ALCALA, ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Defendant City of Florissant, Missouri, has filed an Unopposed Motion to Stay Proceedings (for discovery purposes) and for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond (“Motion to Stay”; ECF No. 24). For the reasons stated herein, the Court grants the Motion to Stay. BACKGROUND The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. KordelSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Charles H. Keating, Jr. v. Office of Thrift SupervisionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.