Legal Opinion

McCowin v. Montgomery

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Mercer County

Decided March 29, 1968No. 37Published

1Opinion of the Court

Acker, J.,

The matter for decision arises from a preliminary objection to defendant’s counterclaim. It is contended that Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1031 requires the counterclaim to be stricken in that it does not spring from the same transaction or series of transactions as that from which plaintiffs’ complaint arises.

Pa. R. C. P. 1031 permits a defendant to “counterclaim” any cause of action or set-off which he has against the plaintiff “. . . (1) which arises from the same transaction or occurrence or series of transactions or occurrences ... , or (2) which arises from contract or…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stroh v. UhrichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
  2. Gilmore v. ReedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
  3. Ott v. DuPlan Silk Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  4. Roth v. PechinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  5. Cochran v. CutterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API