Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Pullman Co.

Illinois Circuit Court

Decided January 6, 1902Published

Motion for leave to file supplemental bill and for temporary injunction based upon the original bill and answer, the affidavits and documentary proof filed in support of such bill and answer, and also upon the supplemental bill proposed to be filed and other affidavits and other documentary proof submitted by the respective parties. Heard before Judge Murray P. Tuley.

1Opinion of the Court

Tuley, J.:

This is a bill filed by Truman A. Taylor as a stockholder-against Pullman’s Palace Car Company on the 28th of December, 1899, praying for an injunction against the defendant, an Illinois corporation, from carrying out an intended purchase of all the property of the Wagner Palace Car Company, a joint stock corporation organized under the laws of' the state of New York, and from delivering to the Wagner Company, or to anyone for it, 200,000 shares ($100.00 each), of the capital stock of the Pullman Company, as the purchase-price proposed to be paid for said property.

Some time prior to…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. United States v. IshamSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  5. United States v. Joint Traffic Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API