Legal Opinion

McFadden v. Ten-T Corp.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 27, 1988No. 86-738PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff, Mary Evelyn McFadden, appeals from a summary judgment granted in favor of the defendant, Ten-T Corporation, in her action to recover damages. We reverse and remand.

The Alabama State Highway Department awarded a contract to Ten-T Corporation as a general contractor to resurface and widen a portion of a state highway in Escambia County. The Highway Department furnished the plans and specifications for the project, which, by contract, Ten-T Corporation was required to follow in the construction. Specifications for the drainage of the highway were specifically included in the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Casrell v. Altec Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  3. Schipper v. Levitt & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  4. Hunt v. BlasiusIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Atkins v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Peters v. ForsterIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Hannah v. Gregg, Bland & Berry, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  3. Aldridge v. Valley Steel Const., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. Dorrell v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  5. Lemond Const. Co. v. WheelerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API