Legal Opinion

State v. Jeney

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 26, 1989No. 1 CA-CR 88-1251PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRANT, Chief Judge.

The defendant was convicted by a jury of possession of narcotic drugs, a class four felony, and possession of drug paraphernalia, a class six felony, both repetitive offenses. He was sentenced to concurrent, mitigated terms of imprisonment.

FACTS

Police officers received a tip from the “silent witness” program that the defendant was selling drugs from his apartment. A few days later, the officers began a surveillance of the defendant’s apartment to determine whether there was any “drug traffic” at his residence. Prior to beginning the surveillance, the officers…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. LefkowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Maryland v. MacOnSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. MeaseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  2. State v. SpreitzArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. SwansonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  4. Bressi v. FordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. State v. AcostaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API