Legal Opinion

Keeton v. City of Ashland

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided July 1, 1994No. 93-CA-000800-MRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge:

This appeal involves an issue of first impression relating to Kentucky Revised Statutes (KRS) Chapter 95. The Boyd Circuit Court ruled that KRS 95.859(3) does not require the City of Ashland (the City) to provide funding for annual cost of living adjustments for pension beneficiaries; and that action taken by the pension fund board in setting a cost of living adjustment was without statutory authority since the pension fund could not support the increase without additional funding by the City. We affirm.

In 1956, the Kentucky Legislature enacted KRS 95.851 through 95.991,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Folks v. Barren CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950
  2. Masonic Widows & Orphans Home & Infirmary v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
  3. Folks v. Barren CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1950
  4. Brooks v. MeyersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955
  5. Maybury v. CoyneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LongCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2003
  2. Sudberry v. Royal & Sun AllianceCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2009
  3. Riddle v. Scotty's Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1999
  4. J.D.K. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2001
  5. American Life & Accident Insurance Co v. Department of InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API