Legal Opinion

Judah v. Mieure

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1839PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from the Knox Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

This was an action of assumpsit brought by a surety against his co-surety for contribution. The plaintiff and the defendant were the sureties of one William Mieure on a promissory note payable to the president, directors, and company of the state bank of Illinois at their branch at Mount Carmel. At the maturity of the note, the principal having failed to pay it, it was paid by the appellee, John Mieure. The declaration contains several special counts, setting forth *172the facts of the case, also the common count for money paid, laid out, and expended. Plea, non assumpsit. By consent of parties,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Odlin v. GreenleafSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1825

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Glasscock v. HamiltonTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Sloo v. PoolIllinois Supreme Court · 1853
  3. State v. ElliottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1863
  4. Michael v. AllbrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Rankin v. CollinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1875

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API