Legal Opinion
IDK, Inc. v. County of Clark
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided December 24, 1984No. CV-LV-84-574 RDFPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion and Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction
ROGER D. FOLEY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, various escort bureaus in Clark County, Nevada, (the Las Vegas area), bring this suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 seeking damages and to enjoin, temporarily and permanently, the enforcement of Clark County Code Chapter 8.32, entitled ESCORT SERVICES. This regulation subjects plaintiffs to various licensing requirements in order to lawfully operate an escort service. Plaintiffs claim the regulation is overbroad and vague; that the regulation is a prior restraint on protected First…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- IDK, Inc. v. County of ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Treants Enterprises, Inc. v. Onslow CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Midvale City Corp. v. HaltomUtah Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re BurgessDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1999
- Idk, Inc. v. County Of ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.