Legal Opinion
(PC) Arrant v. Santoro
District Court, E.D. California
Decided November 3, 2021No. 1:20-cv-01253Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MELVIN R. ARRANT, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-01253-DAD-SAB (PC) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 13 v. ) APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL, WITHOUT PREJUDICE 14 KELLY SANTORO, et al., ) ) (ECF No. 42) 15 Defendants. ) ) 16 ) ) 17 ) 18 Plaintiff Melvin R. Arrant is proceeding pro se and in forma pauepris in this civil rights action 19 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel, filed November 1, 21 2021. 22 There is no constitutional right…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sammy Lee Terrell v. R.D. Brewer, Warden Jon Morales Christopher C. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Gary Lamere v. Henry Risley, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor v. Charles Hamm, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997